BUILDING COMPLAINTS A - Z

 

  WHO ARE THE BEST AND WORST BUILDERS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM? - THE MOST ECOLOGICALLY FRIENDLY AND COMMUNITY MINDED?

GET IN TOUCH IF YOU HAVE A STORY TELL  A-Z INDEX  - LET US KNOW ABOUT THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

GREED IS DESTROYING OUR HERITAGE - Heritage views are fast disappearing from villages as councils scramble to give developers free reign in return for more rates to bolster their coffers, despite the fact that we are in the middle of a climate emergency. Such councils and the developers taking advantage of them are nothing short of climate criminals in the view of country lovers and history buffs. Charles Church Developments Limited shares the same registered office as Persimmon plc. Potentially raising questions as to water pollution, stemming from their conviction in Wales around 2021, when they were fined something like £433,000 in Newport Magistrates.

 

 

 

 

A271 - Suicide Junction, Garner Street, Herstmonceux

Apples

Barratt Homes

Cherry Homes

Charles Church Development Limited - Chapel Green, Herstmonceux - Directors

                      Dean Kendal Finch - Julia Nichols - Michael John Smith - Tracy Lazelle Davison

Clarion Housing Group Limited - Directors -

Councils - East Sussex County, Wealden District

Destruction

Ecology

Fines

Footpaths

Gleeson Homes M J

Habitats

Injustices

Justice

Kapex

Litigation

McAlpine

Nonsense

Ombudsman

Parish Councils - Herstmonceux A to Z Councillors index from 2015 - 2025

Persimmon plc - Directors - Alexandra Helen Depledge - Anand Aithal - Annemarie Durbin 

                     - Andrew James Duxbury - Andrew Wyllie - Colette O'Shea - Dean Kendal Finch

                     - Paula Bell - Roger William Devlin - Tracy Lazelle Davison
Politics - MPs - Cabinet 2025-2026

Potholes

Questions

Redrow Homes

River pollution - Persimmon plc fined £433,331 at Newport Magistrates Court

Sand and Cement

Southern Water Limited (02679874) - Joanne Statton Secretary - Joanne Statton Director

                                                   - Richard Denley John Manning

South East Water Limited (02366620) - Andrew Robert Farmer - Caroline Jane Sheridan

                                  - Celia Pronto Hussey - Christopher Train - David Edwin Hinton

                                  - Lisa Jan Clement - Mark Gerard Denis McCardle 

                                  - Nicolas Alexandre Desire Truillet - William Francis Michael McKinstry
Taylor Wimpey

Thakeham Homes Limited

Transparency

Undervalue

Valuations

Water - Neutrality - Southern Water - South East Water

Wates

Yale

X marks the spot

Yellow warnings

Zebedee

 

 

 

The Infrastructure Illusion: Where Do Housing Levies Really Go?

By Our Investigative Team

As UK councils rapidly approve planning permissions, often overriding environmental concerns, they collect hundreds of millions in developer contributions intended to fund the necessary support systems—roads, schools, and health facilities—that new communities require. Yet, for many residents moving into these freshly minted estates, the promised infrastructure is little more than an illusion.

The system designed to mitigate the strain of growth is failing its purpose, leaving existing villages overwhelmed and new residents paying premium house prices for substandard public services.

The CIL Honeypot and the Public Deficit

The primary mechanisms for funding supporting infrastructure are the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 Agreements. CIL is theoretically calculated to offset the cumulative impact of development, providing funds for strategic projects (roads, flood defenses, schools), while Section 106 deals fund specific, localized mitigation.

Councils are eager to collect this revenue, as it provides an immediate, substantial injection of cash. However, the application of these funds often reveals a disturbing pattern of financial triage, rather than strategic investment.

The reality on the ground highlights the consequences:

- Road Degradation: Already overloaded 'A' and 'B' roads, designed for smaller villages and less traffic density, rapidly deteriorate under the pressure of construction vehicles and the daily commuter load of thousands of new residents. Potholes proliferate, and formerly minor routes become dangerous obstacles.

- Healthcare Collapse: Doctors' surgeries and local medical centers, often operating at capacity before the new estates are built, buckle under the sudden increase in patient lists, leading to impossible waiting times and diminishing care quality.

- School Overcrowding: Existing schools are forced to take on immediate overflow, leading to crowded classrooms, boundary disputes, and delayed plans for new educational facilities.

- Drainage Disaster: Drainage systems, engineered decades ago for low-density settlements, are overwhelmed by the increased hard-standing surface area and runoff from new estates. Even moderate downpours now trigger localized, destructive flooding.

The Pensions Black Hole: Diverting the Development Dividend

A key concern raised by residents and local policy analysts is the apparent diversion of CIL funds away from direct infrastructure projects and toward plugging critical council budget deficits. Many local authorities grapple with significant financial burdens, chief among them being pension funding gaps and social care costs.

While CIL rules technically mandate that the levy must be spent on "infrastructure," the definition of this term can be vague, and funds can be used indirectly to free up general funds for other, more immediate (and politically painful) deficits. The public perception is clear: the money paid by developers, intended to build new roads and schools, is instead sinking into the council’s internal pensions black hole or sustaining core services that should be funded through central government grants or council tax.

This financial sleight of hand creates a vicious cycle: councils gain a temporary financial reprieve, but the actual physical infrastructure deficit continues to widen, undermining the long-term viability of the new communities they approved.

The Broken Promise to New Residents

For homebuyers, this failure is a profound betrayal of value. House prices in new estates are often set at a premium, based on the assumption that the accompanying facilities—new roads, adequate drainage, and modern schools—will be commensurate with the investment.

When new residents discover that their commute is hampered by gridlock, their children cannot get into the local primary school, or their garden is prone to flooding due to overwhelmed Victorian-era pipes, the perceived value of their home plummets. They have paid for a promise of improved community living that the council never delivered.

This mismatch between house price and practical amenity fuels citizen cynicism, cementing the belief that the planning process is less about sustainable growth and more about short-term transactional revenue generation for struggling local authorities.

A Call for Transparency and Enforcement

If the CIL system is to retain any public trust, a radical increase in transparency is required. Councils must be compelled to:

1. Ring-Fence CIL Funds: Ensure CIL revenues are strictly ring-fenced and accounted for against clearly defined, large-scale infrastructure projects, with zero leakage to general fund deficits.

2. Report Detailed Spending: Provide annual, publicly accessible reports detailing every penny of CIL and Section 106 expenditure, allowing residents to easily track where contributions from their specific development have been allocated.

3. Synchronize Delivery: Mandate that key infrastructure (schools, primary road upgrades, and enhanced drainage) must be demonstrably under construction or nearing completion before the final phase of houses can be sold and occupied.

Without such measures, the UK’s housing expansion will continue to be built on a foundation of structural and financial neglect, permanently jeopardizing the quality of life for millions of new homeowners

 

 

 

The issues of the day are coping with a growing population, climate change and pollution - that will cause food and energy shortages, so threatening to destabilize what is good about the region - if we fail to play our part in building a sustainable future based upon a swing towards a more equitable society.

 

Then there is tourism, most of which is based on our unique history. England, Scotland and Wales are home to castles from medieval times, villages and towns that boast Olde world charm, fishing communities, cottages, London town, including the Houses of Parliament, coal and tin mining and industrial development, from iron making to the advent of electricity, and the modern age of computers.

 

 

 

 

.....

 

 

 

 

LINKS

 

https://thakeham.com/

https://www.clarionhg.com/

https://www.charleschurch.com 

http://www.pge.com/

http://mj.gleeson-homes.co.uk/

http://www.gleeson-homes.co.uk/

http://www.taylorwimpey.co.uk
http://www.sir-robert-mcalpine.com
https://www.persimmonhomes.com/

http://www.barratthomes.co.uk
http://www.wates.co.uk
http://www.redrow.co.uk/

http://www.taylorwoodrowinternational.com

 

 

 

 

 

WHO ARE THE BEST AND WORST BUILDERS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM? - THE MOST ECOLOGICALLY FRIENDLY AND COMMUNITY MINDED?

 

RETURN HOME  FOR THE LATEST NEWS & UPDATES AS THEY ARE REPORTED

 

 

This site is protected by Article 9 and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as per the Human Rights Act 1998

and Articles 2, Article 18 and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights